Multi 2♦
Multi 2♦ shows a 6-card weak two of either major.
| 2♦ - | |
|---|---|
| 2♥♠! | P/C |
| 2NT! | (R) INV+ |
| 3♣♦ | NAT F |
| 3♥♠! | P/C |
| 3NT | S/O |
| 4♣! | STR COG |
| 4♦! | PRE COG |
| 4♥♠ | S/O |
There are two common approaches to rebid after the 2NT inquiry:
- Bisect strength and keep all contracts right-sided.
- Trisect strength but allow 3♥♠ to be wrong-sided.
I prefer trisection because it allows accurate description of a wild 2♦ opening.
| 2♦ - 2NT - | |
|---|---|
| 3♣! | INV+, 6+♥ |
| 3♦! | INV+, 6+♠ |
| 3♥ | MIN, 6+♥ |
| 3♠ | MIN, 6+♠ |
There are two kinds of choice of games:
- 4♣ by strength
- 4♦ by distribution
Such distinction helps judging how to react to interference. Besides, 4♣ lets the strong hand declare. On the other hand, 4♦ closes the auction ASAP.
| 2♦ - 4♣ - | |
|---|---|
| 4♦! | TRF, 6+♥ |
| 4♥! | TRF, 6+♠ |
Competitive bidding
Passing the double clearly shows a willingness to play in 2♦x. The question is how to use XX. I recommend using XX to complement 2♥♠ and make efficient use of bidding space. This premise narrows the options down to two promising treatments:
- XX asks for opener’s long major, while 2♥♠ are natural.
- XX asks for opener’s short major, while 2♥♠ retain their P/C meanings.
I prefer the latter, as the former leaves the meaning of 3♥♠ unclear.
| 2♦ (X) | |
|---|---|
| XX! | Ask for the short major |
| 2♥♠! | P/C |